Idealistic Politics Essay

The level of all hitherto vivacious ordination is the history of sept struggles, tell Karl Marx, who is considered to be whizz of the valets intimately-nigh seminal thinkers. Marx categorized these classes in twain broad categories the cautiousie versus the proletariats, the upper class opposed to the lower class and the coterie that progress to access to the factors of production against everybody else who ar compelled to sell their labor. In political fo early(a)stwhile(a) the bourgeois were the committee for managing the common personal matters of the whole middle class (Marx, 20) and in ready to reduce all friction, tension or resistance towards their supremacy they then dictated down a set of ideals and set for all classes and citizens. The ultimate goal of having a mo nononous set of principles was to disintegrate lasting ideals and determine by instigating the proletariats to fully consider the bourgeois set of principles by susp conclusioning their ow n. History, nonwithstanding, has soon enough to see much(prenominal) an emergecome where the bourgeois triumph in instigating such destiny successfully.What progresss in such circumstances rather is a conflict due to disagreement that occurs in the midst of the dogmas of both classes whereby the reality establish ideals of the proletariats clashes with the idealistic values of the bourgeoisie. These conflicts in gambol consider the political ideologies and actions since the politics is the field where the battle of principles occurs, primarily due to two reasons. The first organism that these conflicts leave non surface in the first define except in the political roll due to the austere temperament and secondly the outcomes go out non be reliable unless at a level were they argon made public and irreversible. Evidence of these conflicts comprises in our texts and films, however in differing contexts.In Antig hotshot, Creon represents the bourgeoisie and Ant igone the proletariats in A Discourse on the Moral Effects of the Arts and Sciences the pityingistic discipline and sciences were the corrupting vales instigated by the intellectuals whilst the savage being was the unlearned and nave proletariat, and finally in Marxs communistic Manifesto where the distinctions argon extremely clear among the two classes. In the course of my paper I heed to examine the strength and weakness of distributively of these ideal societies and their implications to political ideology and action.The values of Karl Marxs idealist communist participation may be summed up in the single sentence Abolition of hidden property (Marx, 34). He believed that once common soldier ownership was abolished people would change, and this would finally end the history of all class struggles. fabianism to Marx was an extension or a purer motley of genialism, whereby the people owned every matter and everybody prepareed for the clay, hence no form of personal inte rests was vested in the system. This assumption was made by placing a encounter on human carriage, probably the most unpredictable factor to place all form of earningsr on. Marx was assuming that among a whole class of people no interests were separate and apart from those of the proletariat as a whole (Marx, 33). The high confederation that Marx enactment was one where all the citizens believed exclusively the interests of the wander of magnitude by non desiring to live up to their personal interests.History, however, does non assimilate a basis for pure socialism where a group of people have ceased to exist without all possessions and have lived just by the idea the closest analogy one could give would be of hunter-ga at that placer societies. These societies, however, existed during the prehistoric clock where human attitudes and behaviours were not being unendingly reshaped by the changing economic systems in which people find themselves nowadays, which Marx himself-importance mentions as at that place being no such thing as fixed human genius. Therefore, communism could never work be driving it goes against human nature. mess argon pictorially more(prenominal) free-enterprise(a) than cooperative. Moreover, the possibility for rotation to occur where the bourgeoisie were to come down in their social status to the level of the proletariats and the proletariats rise to nodule of the bourgeoisies could only occur if human nature were to be dismantled, self memories be wiped out and in other words for the revolution to occur successfully in unavoidably to be self induced.Marx in an validatory manner implies how ones self outlay has decreased with the current system when he discusses the dynamics of wage delve and whether it creates property for the laborer. He states that the system is unsuccessful for the laborers, which cannot increase except upon learn of begetting a new cede of wage-laborer for fresh victimization (Marx 34). If we were to refer back to the analogy hunter-gathitherr societies the fruits of ones fag were adjacent when an soulfulness hunted his reward was immediate and did not wait for his fruits or live only in so far as the interest of the ruling class requires it (Marx. 35). In short mans worth and dignity has been demoralized and every unmarried has been converted in paid wage laborersand has reduced relation backss to a mere currency relations (Marx, 21).Individuals were not bounded by the social status hunter-ga in that respectr since everyone shared and everyone knew their worth. The improvement of this system is that it does not create both live for friction to occur beca character it does not include the idea of individuals desiring to wish to pourboire the environment or vest any personal interests into the system. This can primarily be attributed to the value the system advocates of not lack to differentiate people under any circumstances the system does not mak e out race, ethnicity and differences of age and sex no long-lasting have any distinctive social validness (Marx, 26), a trait of hunter-gatherer societies, which Marx so affectionately desires.These values would in fun affect the political ideologies of a system laborious to covert to communism by pickaxe on the one essential condition for the existenceof the bourgeois class, the formation and the augmentation of corking the condition for nifty is wage grasp (Marx, 32). Therefore, the conflicts that would arise would be those that regarding wage drudge and its supply the bourgeoisie would advocate any action that would enhance the competition in the midst of laborers the key behind keeping a continuous supply of wage agitate opposed to the proletariats immediate hold of cutting off this supply and by doing so ensuring its immediate aim of overthrowing the bourgeois supremacy. Any decline in wage labour would threaten the bourgeoisies groovy by reducing its sophisticat eover, hence enfeebling their foothold in the marketplace in turn inhibiting their ability to constantly urge on the instruments of production in order to exist and survive (Marx, 21).The bourgeoisie quest to undertake a continuous wage labour would see a shift in their political ideology they would seek to make cities, provinces and other nations that are weak cause them to become dependent on them. The here and now of such political centralization would lead to the epidemic of overproduction, whereby the only manner in which the crises can be overcome is by the conquest of new markets, and by the and by the more through exploitation of the old ones (Marx, 25).However, such exploitation of markets can occur only to a certain limit, until other nations impose regulations confiding the system to recompense to desperate measures and upheaval, which occurred with China. Chinese products flooded the world market until recently and now they have been rejected entry into the World deal Organization (WTO) and do not jazz the benefits of free swop. Therefore, China have apply enforced destruction of a potful of productive forces (Marx, 25) to decrease their output, which has lead to a lot of turmoil inside the republic with dogmas of the government political stability and external recognition and the working class subsistence and a better life clashing against individually other further depressing the situation. worry Karl Marx, J.J. Rousseau also painted a picture of ideal gild. In his Discourse on the Moral Effects of the Arts and Sciences he condemns how societies have succumbed to humanities and sciences that have mold our behavior, and taught our passions to speak an artificial language (Rousseau, 6) with the desire to please one another with performances exemplary of their mutual approbation (Rousseau, 4). He believed that individuals were jailed in the values and ideals of bon ton that the arts and sciences strengthened, whereby everyone followed and nobody dared to be prompted by their inner selves in order not be seen as outcasts, resulting in man losing his individuality.In a nutshell, Rousseau believed that the arts and sciences had tainted origins and they strengthen our crimes by fostering our desire for hassock by transforming individuals into sugar coated pills, whereby jealousy, suspicion, fear, coldness, reserve, hate and fraud lie constantly stop under the uniform and deceitful obnubilate of politeness (Rousseau, 7). He in turn pictured a society were he believed man was innately pious was not restrained by societys decorum therefore abandoning the possibilities o the vices that explicate in moderne societies are nonexistent. He understood virtue in price of bravery, courage and strength in other words he saw it in raw force power.The weaknesses in Rousseaus characterization of the ideal society are the assumptions that are embedded in the inquire that he was addressing Whether the restorati on of the arts and sciences has had the import of purifying or corrupting morality? Rousseau has to assume that there has been a revitalisation in the arts as well as assume a blood between purloin and applied fellowship with morality that being the human behavior and customs a society embraces. such(prenominal) assumptions lead Rousseau to pocketbook his argument on a set of contradictions. He view the values of the Persians, Germans and Spartans who had an unusual social social organisation where there was no study of abstract education, no accumulation of property and military virtues were emphasized. The idealizations of such societies contradicted his resentment for etiquette or what he referred to as the veil of politeness, since there exists no organization whereby more discipline, etiquette or order to our rude but life care morals is required than military organizations.throughout the discourse the theme of man change state corrupt once he enters society and los ing his individuality because they all act the analogous under the same circumstances too (Rousseau, 6) is repeatedly emphasized. This argument in itself is unsuccessful because if it is the grouping of people that induces people to conceal themselves and live among uncertainty, Rousseaus ideal society would truly only function for marooned individuals since such a level of accolade could not occur in the natural dynamics of human societies. When individuals act, the views and ideals of others depart then affect the way the individual will live his life, since it is part of human nature to conform to the rules and regulations of others, which are a show of ideals and values that compromise the principles of society.For a society to function in harmony there has to be round common cornerstone whereby all the different members of that society must(prenominal) conform to and must sacrifice some of their individual ideals for the betterment of the society. Rousseau argues th at man would not have to sacrifice his own ideals if he was not placed in the blasphemies of modern societies since he assumes humans are really good and everyone would approve of the actions of others. This in itself breaks Rousseaus argument since there is exists no yardstick to measure good and even if there were to exist such a measure, differences on which good is appropriate would in turn cause conflicts.The simplicity of the society Rousseau describes is its initial strength the simpler ones life, the palette on which he is to express his bad perspectives becomes less like the American savageswho live entirely on the products of the chaseand yoke, indeed, cannot be imposed on men who stand in hire of nothing (Rousseau,5). In a society where the inescapably do not go past the basic physiological, safety and social needs and are readily agreeable the room for corruption becomes minimal. Therefore, I believe Rousseaus attack on the arts and sciences is not so much on their origins or sources but more so on how it manages to widen our needs to include self-actualization and self-realization needs, which are needs that are satisfied by luxuries and how we appear in relation to the people surrounding us a need where the veil and corruption required to have those needs satisfied.Rousseaus painting of such an ideal society would not require a political system, however if all his assumptions were suspended the political implications would be drastic. In politics rarely is something said literally and in a society where the members innately believe that everyone is sincerely good, would not be capable of reading between the lines and would end up in turmoil since other nations would manipulate their naivety. Furthermore, in a society where abstract knowledge such a geometry and economics is not taught the politicians will be incapable of drawing upon actions that will be favour their society, since politics is the abhorrence of all sciences and without a good base in its basic terminology that being the abstract sciences one will be incapable of mastering it and using it to his advantage. utter from their heartoffend someone.do not take careIn Antigone the Hellenic tragedy, morals, egos, and gender issues were the epics around which principles were based upon. maintain one manHarun Al Rashid..Mamluks..they use to be all loyal move class has less say in the political era in order to stop the formation of proletariats which is so primal for the revolution to occur.Political laws that protect occult propertyEnhance competitiveness (p.21) habituation of poor countries on rich (.23) bring off opposition immediatelyStrength of prletarits p.28 trade unionsp.32 existence remains on capital1) Basecaus they lay down ideals that seem Utopian only to them, they forget2) Might have noticed that there are more cons than prosSeveral of our texts paint images of ideal human society. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of these imagined societi es. How do these imagined ideal societies interact with political ideology and political action.BibliographyMarx, Karl and Friedrich Engels. The Communist Manifesto. New York Bantam, 1992.Sophocles. The Three Theban Plays Antigone, Oedipus The King, Oedipus at Colonus. Trans. RobertFagles. New York Penguin, 1977.Communism Could Never work Because it goes against human nature. People are course more competitive than cooperative. http//www.wsu.edu/brians/hum_303/nature.html