Do You Think Advertising to Children Should Be Banned Essay

Do you think advertisement to children should be banned? Why or why non? It is an constituted fact that companies might benefit from right understanding of the childrens office staff in purchasing process. It is considered to be the case adults argon loyal to those brands which they be used to enjoy in their childhood. Moreover, getting elder, children may influence their parents kinda deeply. Parents tend to work more and earn more to make up the deficiency of the time to spend with their children by making some purchases. Thus, legal advertise addressed to the young audience is in the interests of manufactures. Due to a possible harmful effect on children advertising is the subject of broad speculation whether it should be banned or not. It is important to find kayoed which groups of children run the risk. Many researches describing human socializations process landmark it in several similar stages (T commensurate 1). This division is very relative, but not devoid of se nse.The summarized stage from birth to 2 years is not portentous for consideration due to lack of ability to distinguish between commercials and other(a) TV programs which appears in the second stage (2 6 years). In this stage, children weart tend to deconstruct contradictions in their opinions and are not cap sufficient to tend difference between their own belief and another tier of view thrust on them. At the age of 6 8, children are aware of existence of opinions which may differ from their own beliefs, but do not exhibit the ability to actually think from another mortals perspective. At the fourth stage (9 10 years), children are sufficient to accept another point of view, but are not qualified to consider situations as an impartial side. Children at this stage are able to understand advertising intent and recognize bias in advertising.However, they take away no defenses against advertising. At the last(a) stage (since 11 years), teenagers are able to set up hypothes es and take into account all possible options. They moderate already got some knowledge of advertising tactics and appeals. As sheer from this analysis, the most defenseless element here is children aged by eight. However, they are allowed to make just a simple consumer choice and strictly contain pecuniary resources. As for elder children, they have more substantial financial recourses and considerable freedom. Besides, they may influence parents choice in areas such as electronic devices etc.Some people argue for ban against advertising. Nevertheless, thither are some refutations of necessity to ban it. For example, younger children rely in their choice most on in-store experience rather than information introduced by adds. As for teenagers, they tend to use alternative sources of information, parental advice or peers opinions. close to researchers believe that some people have not got the certain characteristics of the final stage even during adulthood. The question arises a s to not just advertising to children, but advertising to everyone. In my opinion, the most reasonable way is to cut back (or even ban in certain cases) advertising of goods such as cigarettes, alcohol and non-nutritious foods.