In sociology, why do we think of the work of Karl Marx as 'conflict Essay

In sociology, why do we think of the pull in of Karl Marx as divergence theory - Essay ExampleHowever, this was first presented as an official theory by Karl Marxwho laid the creation for a number of genial movements that would redefine history. From a sociological standpoint, what is meant when Karl Marxs theory is referred to as a conflict theory? Usually, when one thinks of Karl Marx, he automatically conjures up thoughts of conflict theory. Why is this so? The effort is thatin some circlesMarx is thought to be the founder of conflict theory (Henslin, 2007, pp. 28). Social conflict theory, is, in a nutshell, that in society, there are the rich and the poorand that the rich are the powerful who take up m all of the resources and exploit the poor in order to gain more wealth. Marxs theory was a wake-up call to the masses. For Marx, capitalism did not mean progress rather, it was a scourge on the conscience of new man, a man who was detached from the community and the communal struggles surrounding him. Marx often saw social conflict as rooted in private ownership (Bartos and Wehr, 2002, pp. 40). The difference between the haves and the have-nots has always been a pressure level social issue, becoming even more so when capitalism was the governing system. This is the kind of dominance that social theory rails against. Marxs main idea was that the community should struggle together. The community should suffer together. ... commie ideology gained popularity throughout the Cold War. Vladimir Lenin adopted the ideology as his own strategy to not notwithstanding have the people contribute to the estate communally, but as well to empower the economy of the Russian state. Leninism was presented as the correct theory and practice of Marxism and as the theory of scientific communism, incorporating the dictatorship of the proletariatMarxs critiques were also reformulated as societal laws of development that fed into the study of clique relations and productio n (Lowes, 2006, pp. 158). The notion that the functional class was the one in control was the main staple of Communism. The people were the ones in control. The working class had to conquer its freedom under the flag of the Communist party (Weitz, 1997, pp. 250). People did not own any possessions. No religious expression was allowed, and very strict laws of ethics were followed. Communism was an experiment that failedbadly. Mann (2002) states, Communist governments some(prenominal) of them led by men trained in Moscow are in command of nations impression almost 800 million people (pp. 115). There are still Communist countries existing today. There hang on at least some common features among the five remaining Communist statesChina, Cuba, Laos, sum Korea, and Vietnamalthough the differences between, for example, China and North Korea are enormous (Brown, 2009, pp. 3). Many of the people in these countries subsist in squalor and have half-size economic or collective bargainin g power. This is where socialism becomes an alternative option. Even though people may not like the idea of a Communist government, socialism